- Joined
- Nov 12, 2015
- Posts
- 6,342
It kinda depends what the NCAA is for. If it's going to be a professional breeding ground then it seems you'd be better selecting US kids as an alternate pathway to the USST. Euro recruits are probably not the cream of the crop given I can't imagine a kid with a solid chance of WC or Europa Cup starts throwing it in for the NCAA.
The alternative is to regard NCAA as an amateur adjunct to education, as presumably it originally started as for all sports before those big sports became huge revenue drivers. In which case make the best of whoever is there already and maybe you'll turn up the odd gem. But the primary goal should be to turn out future coaches for the kids of the future.
It needs to be a 20 year plan not a 10 year plan to get the next Mikaela. You might never get one of them again.
The alternative is to regard NCAA as an amateur adjunct to education, as presumably it originally started as for all sports before those big sports became huge revenue drivers. In which case make the best of whoever is there already and maybe you'll turn up the odd gem. But the primary goal should be to turn out future coaches for the kids of the future.
It needs to be a 20 year plan not a 10 year plan to get the next Mikaela. You might never get one of them again.