Huh, what next....people will try to claim Geology is a real science .....as Sheldon would say....
As a physicist in my former life, I'm going to jump in:
1) Chemistry is NOT a subset of physics. Chemistry is defined as a science dealing with systems large enough the individual physical process is NOT the dominant factor. Instead, the system that is a collection of individual physical systems has unique behavior that's described by...chemistry! (biology isn't a subset of chemistry either)
That said, this argument is pretty tangential to the skiing style discussion.
2) Physics can both describe and determines how objects move. Because fundamentally physics determines how things moves, if you do understand physics, you can then describe any movement with principle of physics.
This also have very little to do with skiing style
3) As someone posted, two racers can take 2 different path and reach the bottom at the same time, there're often times more than one way to achieve a result. Physics allows that. Any time you have more than one factors, you can have more than one solutions. Any multi-variable equation can have more than one solution: the same number of solution as the number of variables. That's not even physics. That's high school math.
So, skiing being a multi-variable physics problem, there will be more than one way to ski that're equally efficient!
But before we conclude styles are different way of skiing, keep in mind also even the goal of skiing are not unique. Some people ski to be at the bottom the quickest (racers), at any cost. Others to gain the maximum height & hang time (freestylers). Still others to minimize the stress to the joints, sacrificing speed and distance (old geezers).
And we haven't even start to take into account of physiological difference of human bodies yet.
Of course geology is a science. Are you really referencing a tv show?Huh, what next....people will try to claim Geology is a real science .....as Sheldon would say....
We can't even seem to agree whether or not ski bases are porous enough to absorb wax.
Sintereddepends on the material....
Who's this "we"?We can't even seem to agree whether or not ski bases are porous enough to absorb wax.
We can't even seem to agree whether or not ski bases are porous enough to absorb wax.
depends on the material....
Sintered
Who's this "we"?
Base material is spec'd on wax absorption properties. It varies from spec but still. It's measured.
Who's this "we"?
Base material is spec'd on wax absorption properties. It varies from spec but still. It's measured.
But that shows so much style. I liked the right cheek bounce to faceplant, but the total surrender slide was awesome. 8.5 from the Scottish judge.I promise you, I did not upload this to brag about my skiing (it's best with sound!):
Exactly, style is like a fingerprint each of has. Our own unique flavor.
I see...
So if my style stinks, is pretty heavy, takes effort to produce, I feel flushed, and yet always seem to move downhill,,,,,,
Skiing is both science and art. Science contributes to style in that form follows intent and function and leads to style. Art contributes, in much the same way as two great guitarists will differ in their playing and be recognizable.
Agree, that you should ignore style, and concentrate on skiing. Looking good is a consequence of skiing well.
I think that confidence when skiing is what you are referring to, when you have everything going well it just flows turn to turn. On days that it is not working you look and feel out of the zone and that's a bad day. I am guessing that we all have had those days, I know that I have had at least one this season.I was thinking more in plumbing terms.......
I think the "style" comes in when you are doing it right. Meaning if you are doing it well, you will be more relaxed and it will show.