Seems to me you're fishing for the higher ground.Seems to me that you keep fishing for using tuning to make up for some kind of lack of skill.
Seems to me you're fishing for the higher ground.Seems to me that you keep fishing for using tuning to make up for some kind of lack of skill.
His skiing looked great most of the day although he was mostly standing around. His last run looked technically sound until it didn't. He wasn't that old either, so likely there because he had recent race experience."Coach" doesn't necessarily translate to actual skiing ability, IME. My brother's mogul coach was amazing and has moved on to coaching for the USST but couldn't ski at the level of the athletes he coached even at a junior level and was quite aware of that fact.
Straight ski (likely you've never skied on them since you've asked).Which skis in particular you're talking about? The torsional stiffness of skis varies greatly.
This thread was never about me wanting to do anything, it was about verifying my suspicion that many/most SL racers use 0 bevel (despite what I'd been told elsewhere).
I agree, I ski 0.5 on all my skis and am fully aware of the focus it takes, on a moments in attention (generally ultra slow speed) results in body slam, tunes like this require commitment (take that however you want as its meant that way ).His skiing looked great most of the day although he was mostly standing around. His last run looked technically sound until it didn't. He wasn't that old either, so likely there because he had recent race experience.
End of the day, I don't believe anyone short of a college or FIS level racer would benefit any more from a 0 than a 0.5.. and it might be a mistake if you're not 100% focused on that ride..
Do it and please report back. I’d also like to know. 0.5 degrees on a 1-2 mm edge seems insignificant.I am my own service tech.
Any hookiness could probably be cured by gummi stone detune on the slope - a temporary fix.
I've certainly skied shaped skis set at 0.
I read somewhere here recently that entire rental fleets are sometimes set at 0, ie I think you guys are being overly dramatic re the consequences of no bevel.
This thread was never about me wanting to do anything, it was about verifying my suspicion that many/most SL racers use 0 bevel (despite what I'd been told elsewhere).
also ... not on grippy snow (e.g., Colorado)Nor Am and up, yes. Much below that, no.
Yep! Super variable. Personally, i don't know anyone rec racing or tech skiing on a zero base bevel, but if the OP wants to give it a go, I say have at it. There seems to be a pretty major disconnect between what worked in the staight ski era vs. now, but he'll figure it out. Or not.also ... not on grippy snow (e.g., Colorado)
There seems to be a pretty major disconnect between what worked in the staight ski era vs. now, but he'll figure it out. Or not.
No but a small % do, I know of two friends who do have some of their race skis tuned to zero. Both are Masters racers still trying to stay on top of the heap. Having quicker side to side action helps to make-up for loss of flexibility as they age. I have made several laps on these skis as one of these friends is a BSB (Boot Sole Buddy). They must be kept on edge or they will punish you.Do a significant % of people run 0 base bevel for SL (perhaps on iciest courses)?
WHICH STRAIGHT skis.Straight ski (likely you've never skied on them since you've asked).
And you keep those completely sharp, tip to tail?203 Blizzard Firebird Thermo RS race room stock
205 Blizzard Thermo RS
200 Atomic SL race room stock
Just to name a few. I still have those.
Yes 0/2! Tip to tail since new. I never believed the detune concept.And you keep those completely sharp, tip to tail?