That looks tasty!And just to trigger the purists... I will be serving Cincinnati Chili for the Super Bowl to honor my Bengals.
Truthfully, I don't even consider it "chili," but whatever it is, it is delicious!
View attachment 158468
Thinking about it, I guess you could win high or low. Where I'm coming from though is purely prurient interest. OK...not prurient but uncultured curiosity.Where there's sour cream, there's going to be beets.
Heh. Set them the task of making okra edible. That will teach them.
OK, but if someone posts 34.7 does that give them more or less win in threads like this?
Chile con carne with beans is an oxymoron. There is no such thing, just as there is no such thing as a hot fudge sundae with bananas, strawberries and pineapple. The moment beans hit the pot, whatever you're cooking has turned into something else; that something else might be very good to eat, but it's not chili. Most of what is passed off as chili in the US is actually a delicately seasoned beef stew, similar to Elizabeth Taylor's favorite, and it has very little (if any) chile picante in it. You can't have "chiles with meat" if you don't really use any chiles.
I like both Elizabeth Taylor and her favorite stew very much, but neither of them are chili.
None of what I've said here is mere opinion, it is objective fact.
24.8In threads like this, and Tex's threads, posters should be required to include their BMI.
24.1
LOL! Yeah, I can see how that makes sense. But I'm from Florida, and my dad spent many years in Texas and taught me the deep and abiding love of a good bowl of red. One of my prized possessions is his hardcover copy of Frank Tolbert's A Bowl of Red, which is the definitive work on the subject.We can assume your authority given your username. But given your location of Michigan, some doubts may arise.
Ah, definitions. I've always understood that chile indicates in Spanish the hot fruit of capsicums, and chile con carne the dish of chiles and meat that is rendered in English as chili.I consider chili and chile to be two very different dishes. I lived in New Mexico for 9 years and would never call the tomato, beef, bean, etc dish chile.
This is chile. https://madeinnewmexico.com/blogs/recipes/new-mexico-green-chile-stew
This is the basic recipe I based my most recent batch of chili on. https://www.daringgourmet.com/spicy-chipotle-chili-with-hominy/
In threads like this, and Tex's threads, posters should be required to include their BMI.
24.1
86 the spaghetti and replace with French fries..And just to trigger the purists... I will be serving Cincinnati Chili for the Super Bowl to honor my Bengals.
Truthfully, I don't even consider it "chili," but whatever it is, it is delicious!
View attachment 158468
86 the spaghetti and replace with French fries..
I've heard that Elvis liked his chili over rice.I will admit to enjoying chile over rice.
I'll show myself out.
Interesting question. I got into a big argument with an Indian colleague at work when he wouldn't accept that all chilies originally came from the New World, the West Indies, Mexico, Central and South America. The Spanish and Portuguese traders spread them around the world in exchange for spices and other Asian goods. Also, tomatoes, corn, beans, squash, chocolate, vanilla, allspice, potatoes, sweet potatoes, pineapple, etc. etc. But not lentils. So these recipes are a legacy of those early days after the colonization of the Americas.Where does some of the Indian or Middle Eastern Lentil dishes fit into this kerfuffle?
Lots of chili powder, tomato, and other spices; some with meat some not. Wouldn't these fit the descriptions on here pretty well?
Does Chile HAVE to come from Mexico, the Southwest, or even Texas?
Yes we associate Italy with tomatoes and peppers..neither of which existed before the 1500s there. The Romans ate barley, olives, beans and lamb. With the asparagus thrown in. And some turnips...Interesting question. I got into a big argument with an Indian colleague at work when he wouldn't accept that all chilies originally came from the New World, the West Indies, Mexico, Central and South America. The Spanish and Portuguese traders spread them around the world in exchange for spices and other Asian goods. Also, tomatoes, corn, beans, squash, chocolate, vanilla, allspice, potatoes, sweet potatoes, pineapple, etc. etc. But not lentils. So these recipes are a legacy of those early days after the colonization of the Americas.
To be fair Italians bred some pretty awesome tomatoes from what they received and every culture that eats chilesYes we associate Italy with tomatoes and peppers..neither of which existed before the 1500s there. The Romans ate barley, olives, beans and lamb. With the asparagus thrown in. And some turnips...
Ugh. I've only been to Skyline once, got it on a hot dog and it was disgusting. No, it's not chili, it's more like a very simple Mediterranean tomato sauce, which might not have been too bad except for the horrible cheap dog that was under it.I will be serving Cincinnati Chili