Especially in this application:Don't underestimate the power of Cheez-Whiz.....
View attachment 158367
Don't get me wrong... I like real cheeses too. But there's a place for junk cheese too!
Last edited:
Especially in this application:Don't underestimate the power of Cheez-Whiz.....
View attachment 158367
100%!!!Especially in this application:
View attachment 158368
Don't get me wrong... I like real cheeses too. But there's a place or junk cheese too!
Spray cheese for the win!Especially in this application:
View attachment 158368
Don't get me wrong... I like real cheeses too. But there's a place for junk cheese too!
There's no fat on that. That is ham or ham-like product.Yeah, back bacon is kind of a small, tentative step in the right direction.
This is bacon!
View attachment 158365
Spray cheese? Now you've gone too far....Spray cheese for the win!
Pairs nicely with Chicken in a BiskitSpray cheese? Now you've gone too far....
I have no idea what that is...Chicken in a Biskit
I have no idea what that is...
I prefer provolone on my cheese steaks a la Geno's, not Pat's, but my son is a wiz wit guy.Especially in this application:
View attachment 158368
Don't get me wrong... I like real cheeses too. But there's a place for junk cheese too!
Chile con carne with beans is an oxymoron. There is no such thing, just as there is no such thing as a hot fudge sundae with bananas, strawberries and pineapple. The moment beans hit the pot, whatever you're cooking has turned into something else; that something else might be very good to eat, but it's not chili. Most of what is passed off as chili in the US is actually a delicately seasoned beef stew, similar to Elizabeth Taylor's favorite, and it has very little (if any) chile picante in it. You can't have "chiles with meat" if you don't really use any chiles.Snow is coming down pretty good in Texas right now, good time to cook a batch of chili. Texans love to argue about beans or no beans in your chili, I just wonder is this a Texas debate or nation or even global debate? No beans for me in my chili.
The moment beans hit the pot, whatever you're cooking has turned into something else; that something else might be very good to eat, but it's not chili.
None of what I've said here is mere opinion, it is objective fact.
Beans, what the hell are beans? I was stationed in Texas for three years, beans in chili are sacrilegious. A good bowl of red is a good meat dish.
I just made chili this week. It has ground beef, cranberry beans (cooked from dry), kidney beans (canned), and hominy. It’s delicious.
Yum!
If you like hominy, you gotta try making posole (if you haven't already).
Oh, the helmet and edge bevel discussions got nothin' on chili arguments!Finally, we are approaching helmet -- perhaps even edge bevel -- thread levels!
..sour cream
Thread Drift: Who has family members who like do fancify veggies to try to make them special? Like fancy toys that turn zucchini into fusili? Or cauliflower mashed potatoes? Or squash spaghetti??? Can we just have normal veggies please??!? Veggies are not pasta!!!! You're not fooling anyone!!!!
In threads like this, and Tex's threads, posters should be required to include their BMI.
24.1
Chile con carne with beans is an oxymoron. There is no such thing, just as there is no such thing as a hot fudge sundae with bananas, strawberries and pineapple. The moment beans hit the pot, whatever you're cooking has turned into something else; that something else might be very good to eat, but it's not chili. Most of what is passed off as chili in the US is actually a delicately seasoned beef stew, similar to Elizabeth Taylor's favorite, and it has very little (if any) chile picante in it. You can't have "chiles with meat" if you don't really use any chiles.
I like both Elizabeth Taylor and her favorite stew very much, but neither of them are chili.
None of what I've said here is mere opinion, it is objective fact.