I'm wondering what the collective thoughts are out there of the comparison of these seemingly similar (categorically) skis:
Peak 88 - Is this the most versatile here with the lowest floor and the highest ceiling of performance?
Renoun Endurance 88 - Would these be the kings of dampness? Do they prefer carving or are they happy slarving?
Stockli Stormrider 88 - Undeniably a carving bias from these with a long contact edge and strong tail. But can they keep up with the other two in fun-factor off the groomed flats?
Augment 88 - Arguably too strong and powerful for "all-mountain"?
Lusti CWR 87 - ???
88 is a really good all mountain width for the east coast and probably all you need for the off-piste exploration size. I know all too well that a single ski doesn't do everything well, but in a single category do we get a large variance in characteristics with enough variety to make a case for owning multiples?
Peak 88 - Is this the most versatile here with the lowest floor and the highest ceiling of performance?
Renoun Endurance 88 - Would these be the kings of dampness? Do they prefer carving or are they happy slarving?
Stockli Stormrider 88 - Undeniably a carving bias from these with a long contact edge and strong tail. But can they keep up with the other two in fun-factor off the groomed flats?
Augment 88 - Arguably too strong and powerful for "all-mountain"?
Lusti CWR 87 - ???
88 is a really good all mountain width for the east coast and probably all you need for the off-piste exploration size. I know all too well that a single ski doesn't do everything well, but in a single category do we get a large variance in characteristics with enough variety to make a case for owning multiples?
Last edited: