I just don't get the USST. Seems like they always obsess over a few stars. Then complain when those stars are a little different.
I don't really know, but from what I've heard the system seems broken.
Seems so much resources devoted to a few who kind of take care of themselves anyway. Really it should be all about farming new talent. It's not like say baseball where with money you could go out and buy talent. Even that doesn't work anymore. Ask the Yankees.
There are a lot of reasons for the current situation, IMO. When Bill Marolt was the CEO, the tag line became "Best in the World" which frankly meant different things to different people. What was "Best?"
It evolved to many of the best individual stars in the sport. The best woman speed skier ever in LV. Bode, a multiple overall WC winner. Mancuso began at 15, and when Marolt chose to measure success in Olympic and WC medals, she was a big part. We had Ligety emerge as "Mr. GS". We had retirements of guys like Rahlves, and of course the arrival of MS, also making her WC debut at 15. Now she is the best SL skier in recent memory, maybe ever. Not yet 22.
Many of these athletes basically demanded that they be "OP", on their own program, and the USST obliged. That is expensive, and it isn't so much of a team concept. I think the objections might become public when the athlete demands and expense go up, and even more so if performance stalls. We have a lot of injuries, and being critical there is probably not fair. But, yes, the USST has been all in on supporting different programs. Even way back when the Mahre Twins were pretty much on their own. Not new.
I'd suggest that Team is big on the WC these days for most nations. Thing Norwegian men, Italian women, French tech men, etc. The opposite is team Hirscher.
We have had a TON of athletes just leave the sport, or IMO, in some cases be pushed out of the sport. So right now, we have this massive void between our aging "stars" and the up and comers. There are a bunch of birth years that are vacant for the most part. Some suggest they were just "weak" birth years. I don't buy that. Perhaps because I see those who just walked away. We have skiers who we ranked #1 in the world as teens, who were done at 21.
I think in most cases thrown in the breech before they were ready.
There is no real WC bench today at all. We have skiers who will ski a full schedule and in tech not have second runs. In speed, maybe not crack into the top 30 all season? Is that right, or "good?" Many, many schools of thought. Can we prepare them for future success?
So Tiger Shaw has a lot to get straightened out. I'm not going into a progress report, other than to say that I suspect more change. Problem is that you normally don't do that before a WC or Olympic year. There is going to be huge change at the end of the 2018 season. Every time I turn around I hear of an athlete who "pretty much" is quietly saying they will end it at that time. There are many others who are not getting any better and may do the same. Looking at the current team roster, and thinking through who may move on is eye opening.
My hunch is that we are going to have the youngest team in skiing at that point, and that it will require an entirely different set of expectations. We will need to carefully bring along this younger group, and it will take time. I also think it will take an entirely different program and plan. New thinking. New everything.
It won't be easy. The USST has a hard time raising money. The fact that we still have SO many athletes paying for $30K or more of their expenses is just amazing. Tiger has discussed closing this "funding gap" since he took the job, and it was not new then. Maybe the entire plan needs a lot of change.
Back to this thread, over the past 10 or so years, we have had some great individual stars. Best in the world. Even with them, and with awareness probably at an all time high, the sponsorships and fundraising have been a rockfight.
So, yes, it will be a long process. And I am just talking Alpine. We have an awful lot of other athletes and disciplines. They matter a lot to many others. I have my own thoughts. You can't fund them all.
MS is a phenom, but there are plenty of people who wonder whether having such a once a generation athlete has been good for the team. I know young women who I think could be on thr WC right now who were 19,20,21 and were not loving getting smoked by this 15 year old that the team was falling all over. Right now there are U19 coaches being beat up by parents because at their kid's age, MS was on the WC. Nuts, but fact. Has the "MS factor" been good for the sport in this country? I hope so.
When you put all of your energy into one or two athletes, even at the club and academy level, it is really hard to develop a team. Some countries have realized it, and completely changed. The attacking Vikings. The we're fortunate to have a young Svindal step into a leadership role, and embrace this.
A huge amount of resources went to the small number of our best in the world. And based on Marolt's plan, it worked...for about a decade.
My other big pet peeve is the USST and their basic attitude toward college racing as development. We are missing the boat. Other countries sure love it. So many examples. Again, Norway. Canada.
It's going to take time. Good news? There are some great young skiers in the pipeline. A bunch. Patience and celebrating the small things will be critical. And I think creating a sense of team, mutual support, some fun.
Sorry to ramble. This is a hot button with me.
I hope they get it right. At least they see the problem. Team ignored it for many years.