100%.The computers are the single most overrated educational tool in history. Information overload is not a replacement for critical thinking skills.
Funny! Didn't realize the 737 was that old.
- 1918: Commercial air travel in an open-air biplane had existed for only a few years, and was not really practical compared to train travel.
- 1970: Easy to travel by jet on a Boeing 737
- 2022: Pain-in-the-keister to travel by jet on a Boeing 737
People complain about being nickel-and-dimed by airlines today. And I can see their point: it's genuinely at least a little annoying. But, it belies the fact that airfare today is a lot cheaper than it used to be.What was the relative economic accessibility of air travel for the average person then?
In 1974, it was illegal for an airline to charge less than $1,442 in inflation-adjusted dollars for a flight between New York City and Los Angeles. On Kayak, just now, I found one for $278.
What was the relative economic accessibility of air travel for the average person then? I know I can count on two or three fingers the number of times I was on a plane as a kid / teen. (Then again we didn't go to restaurants either.)
The Star Trek game we played on the computer was done through a dot matrix printer and imagination. Lots and lots of imagination.
People complain about being nickel-and-dimed by airlines today. And I can see their point: it's genuinely at least a little annoying. But, it belies the fact that airfare today is a lot cheaper than it used to be.
This fact stuck out:
What I suspected.It wasn't meant for average-person leisure travel then. It was meant for business travel.
My dad had several incarnations / variations of this model over the years. They were all fixer uppers. They were beautiful and neighbors marveled at them, partly because imported cars were still relative rarities. However, they were, to put it mildly, not particularly reliable. Eventually he seemed to decide that the hours of swearing as he lay under the cars on his back on the gravel in our cold, wet carport were not worth the upside.
My dad had several incarnations / variations of this model over the years. They were all fixer uppers. They were beautiful and neighbors marveled at them, partly because imported cars were still relative rarities. However, they were, to put it mildly, not particularly reliable. Eventually he seemed to decide that the hours of swearing as he lay under the cars on his back on the gravel in our cold, wet carport were not worth the upside.
Pit. Some folks build those.. cheaper than a lift..This is why my cousins had a stand-up trench in the barn.
In 1970, I suspect most people had never heard of a computer, let alone seen one.
You can be wrong and also be right.Not to pile on, but also the space program was very much in everyone's living room on TV in the 60's, also in all the newspapers. Esp. the Apollo missions and there were endless reports of not only the onboard guidance computers, but also the mission control mainframes. So at least in the "developed world" with access to news, people heard of computers.
I'll take 1970 onward too, but I think the question was, during which period was more progress been made, not "what were things like at the beginning of each period?" Nor was the question, "which period ended with a cumulative total of more progress from all preceding periods?" because of course each one builds on the previous one, as has been discussed.It seems like everyone is comparing arguable the best decade (1960-1970, but not the roaring 20s since none of us were there) against everything after. You forget that before then, the world was literally in the dark ages in terms of technology and human rights.
Put it this way, if you drop some members on this board back to 1918, they wouldn't be able to vote, go to school, own properties, get proper employment, marry someone they love, and face daily discrimination if not down right violence for a few decades.
So yea, I'll take the 1970 onward.
When I took my required Computer Science programming course for M.E. in the mid/late 60's, the mainframe was down being replaced, so we just printed out our punchcard programs and turned them in. No such thing as a PC or workstation. Never used computers at work, except for CAD, until we got PC's because the procedures for using the mainframe were so nebulous and undocumented.You can be wrong and also be right.
I think the point still stands, that computers were things that maybe a university engineering school or department had a few of them and they may have been in pop culture in 1970. But certainly not something that most people had even seen for themselves. And these days every car, appliance, phone, etc... Has a computer built in.
Nobody wrong, just sharing thoughts and ideasYou can be wrong and also be right.
I think the point still stands, that computers were things that maybe a university engineering school or department had a few of them and they may have been in pop culture in 1970. But certainly not something that most people had even seen for themselves. And these days every car, appliance, phone, etc... Has a computer built in.