• For more information on how to avoid pop-up ads and still support SkiTalk click HERE.

Wanted: drill for narrow stance

Mendieta

Master of Snowplow
SkiTalk Tester
Contributor
Joined
Aug 17, 2016
Posts
4,903
Location
SF Bay Area, CA, USA
I don't think that stance, wide and narrow, and pressure distribution between outside and inside ski are the same thing. It might help to better understand what causes you to crash; for example, because your skis get crossed, or something else.

Oh, I was taking a powder lesson so it was clear. I was crashing because i had 90mm skis, not very wide for my 180lbs (plus equipment weight). I was putting all my weight on the outside ski, sinking in sierra cement (it was a very wet day), and going over the handle bars. Making round turns with more uniform weight distribution fixed the issue and allowed me to have a blast.

So, in my case, the issue was the weight distribution, not the width of the stance, and I agree they are different, but I suspect they are related. Or maybe it is my poor technique, but I have a much easier time spreading the weight equally with a narrower stance. It also makes it easier for me to make round turns on soft snow. Anyway, good point!
 

karlo

Out on the slopes
Inactive
Joined
May 11, 2017
Posts
2,708
Location
NJ
sinking in sierra cement (it was a very wet day), and going over the handle bars. Making round turns with more uniform weight distribution fixed the issue and allowed me to have a blast.

Round turns, more uniform weight distribution..., is that you at 1'46"?


Re going over the handle bars, if you have more uniform weight distribution, you are more stable standing on the skis. Then, I think it's a matter of your core working to keep you solid, to power through it.

That 1 or 2 seconds at 1'46", note the stance, not narrow. Note the track, weight distribution is even. He's just standing on the skis throughout the turn.

BTW, 90-mm is fine, as you seemed to have discovered.
 

john petersen

working through minutia to find the big picture!
Instructor
Joined
May 8, 2017
Posts
327
Location
Eastern
Not sure if it has been said before....but a fun way to ski quicker turns is to borrow some shorties with adjustable bindings. its great fun and there are several learning moments with regards to fore/aft balance that will really clue you in as to where you are standing over your feet!

JP
 

Alexzn

Ski Squaw
Skier
Joined
Nov 13, 2015
Posts
1,956
Location
Bay Area and Truckee
Re: powder skiing. I keep quoting Shane McConkey, who got pretty much everything right when he wrote a guide to using Volant Spatulas. Here it is verbatim:

Mental Floss

A guide to the Volant Spatula, the world’s greatest powder ski.

By Shane McConkey


Important! You really should read this before you ski on your new Spatulas.


Keep this guide so that you can refer back to it after you have tried the Spatulas. It will help remind you of certain things you will need to know.


CONGRATULATIONS!You have just purchased the most progressive invention in the history of powder skiing since the original fat skis were invented. These skis will change the way you thought you were supposed to ski powder, minimize the effort you put into your skiing, and greatly improve your powder skiing experience.

The following is meant to give you some idea of what the Spatulas are all about, why they are shaped the way they are and how to ski them.

First of all, in order to clear your mind and attempt to make sense of all this, take most everything you have ever learned about skiing and stick it where the sun don’t shine. Or at least in the garage next to your shaped skis. Why? Because:

1.Side cut is NOT good in powder.

2.Camber is NOT good in powder.

3.Carving is NOT necessary in the powder.

Simply put, if you want to maximize your abilities in soft snow you do notwant to use the same tool as you would on any kind of hard, groomed or compacted snow.


HOW TO SKI YOUR NEW SPATULAS
As you well know your new Spatulas have a very unique almost bizarre shape. It is important for you to understand the adjustments to your skiing technique you will need to make in order to ski them well. Don’t worry! Its easy. Many people may get intimidated by the progressive shape of the Spatula and think that it takes an expert to know how to manage them. Not true! These skis will make powder skiing much easier for even the least experienced beginners. Actually the opposite concepts explained here will be much easier for a beginner to grasp than an expert conditioned to use their skis the way they always have. The expert will have to open their mind and be prepared for some very different concepts. Or simply, they must floss their brain!



Ski on both feet!

Put your weight a bit more on two feet throughout the turn instead of mostly on your downhill ski. This will help you stay afloat and facilitate sliding when you need to. You will also be able to load up your downhill ski as you normally would in most soft snow situations but knowing how and when to use both feet will greatly increase your abilities with the Spatulas.Sun crust and wind affect are prime examples of when to use both feet. In these conditions the Spatulas will blow your mind. Normally these conditions would require you to slow way down and be very careful not to hook a tip. Not anymore. Ski on two feet and let ‘er rip!


OPEN IT UP!
Your powder skiing experience is about to change dramatically.It will become much easier for you to maintain control at higher speeds. If you were the type of powder skier who used to make lots of slow, little bouncing up and down turns then you need to try going faster. Open it up and go for it! You can still milk the powder slowly if you want but after you get the hang of hauling ass you won’t want to putt around anymore.

SLIDE INSTEAD OF CARVE!
Yes, believe it or not this is something that you should be trying to do in the powder. Sliding will be the most difficult of Spatula techniques to learn but you should be able to get the idea in time. Even if you never attempt to learn slides you will still be able to blow doors on everyone else without Spatulas. Who knows, you might just naturally start doing them anyway. The more dense and compacted the snow is the easier it will be to perform slides. Sliding will greatly improve your maneuverability and control. Begin your powder turn and then instead of hitting your edges hard to carve a turn, stand up on two feet and let your skis slide or skid diagonally across the fall line. It will be harder to perform a slide directly down the fall line. Start off doing them diagonally.


Trade skis with a friend for a run.

Just to compare what you used to ski on to what you have now. I guarantee you will only try this once and then you will keep your Spatulas for yourself!

FLOATATION AND SLIDING
In order to better understand why the Spatulas are so efficient the two most important concepts to grasp are flotation and sliding.In a ski world where everyone is constantly thinking power, pressure and carving it may seem like a crazy concept to accept almost the opposite theory. Then again soft snow is pretty much the opposite as hard snow. Retraining your mind that sliding not carving is actually a good thing is a very hard concept for many people to swallow.

A ski which is fat under foot will float much more than a ski which is narrow under foot. A ski with reverse side cut will give the skier the ability to slide their turns where as side cut will force the skier to sink and carve. Reverse side cut combined with decamber immediately puts the tip and tail higher than the waist of the ski as well as pulls the edges of the ski away from the snow leaving the point of first contact with the snow at the waist of the ski. When you set your skis sideways to start a slide there is much less ski at the tip and tail to catch the snow and prevent the slide. It also helps to eliminate catching your downhill edges and stuffing it. The Spatulas are also twin tipped. This helps immensely for initiating a slide. Expert skiers can use the twin tip to ski and land backwards if they wish. Skiing backwards in the powder will be surprisingly easy compared to any other twin tipped powder ski.

In virtually all situations you will still be able to carve your turns. The Spatulas simply give you the option to initiate a slide or to scrub speed by sliding similar to how you would do it on the groomer. Why is it so easy for snowboarders to scrub speed in the powder? Why is it so easy for them to make turns and go fast when skiers are laboring slowly down the hill? Why do snowboarders use less energy than skiers in the powder? It is a simple matter of flotation. Snowboarders are always on top of the snow. Skiers are mostly down in it. The Spatulas will give you all the benefits of snowboarding’s floatation and ease as well as satisfaction in the fact that you are actually on skis and still have all the luxuries and mobility options that skiing offers.


REVERSE SIDE CUT
For normal skis side cut is used to make it easier to turn. You simply roll the ski on edge, add some pressure to the ski and it carves around. In recent years ski manufacturers have been adding significant amounts of side cut to their skis greatly facilitating the ski experience for everyone. This is true. ON HARD SNOW!

In powder or soft snow side cut creates two distinct negative effects:

1.“The Pool Cover”- Your weight is directly on top of the narrowest part of the ski. This type of weight distribution immediately puts you in a sinking into the snow situation similar to what happens to the pool cover when you try to run across it. This causes your tips and tails to float but the center of your skis where all your weight is sinks, bogs down and then you must plow through the snow. You will be forced to carve every turn and expend a lot of energy bouncing in and out of the snow.

Sinking/carving = Bad. Floating/sliding = Good.

2.“The Unstable Hooker”- Skis become very unstable and much more difficult to control. In sun crust or wind affect you may have noticed the occasional Unstable Hooker. This is when you start a turn and your downhill ski hooks fast and hard up and across your uphill ski. You cross your tips, step on your downhill ski with your uphill and then stuff your face into mountain. Or at high speeds you may have noticed your skis trying to swim around a bit making it hard to control as you try to keep your tips up and out of the snow. The solution to this in the past has always been to maintain a wider stance in powder and to slow it down a bit.


Fortunately now you can use your Spatula to dish out a good spanking to that Unstable Hooker and Pool Cover. The reverse side cut of the Spatulas immediately sets you afloat on top of the snow allowing you to initiate turns and negotiate everything you encounter much more easily without having to labor through it. Reverse side cut also eliminates the instabilities commonly encountered with “shaped” skis in the soft snow. You will notice little or no Unstable Hookers and you will be able to enjoy a much more relaxed stance in variable snow and at high speeds.


You will also notice that the Spatulas feel much lighter while on your feet than other skis of similar surface area. Try swinging them from side to side while on the lift. This effect is created by the reverse side cut. It gives them a very light swing weight. Normal skis with side cut have a weight distribution which puts the bulk of the skis at the tips and tails. The Spatulas are the opposite. The bulk is at the waist. The Spatulas are a lot of ski and there is a lot down there stuck to your feet. However, they will feel much lighter and more maneuverable than you can imagine.

DECAMBER
On normal skis camber is used to add power and extra pressure to the tip and tail of the ski. This gives the ski stability, strength and helps it initiate a turn. It also and adds power through the arc of the turn. This is true, ON HARD SNOW!

In soft snow camber has these negative effects:


1.“The Sunken Plow” – Tips and tails are constantly trying to dive down into the snow. No matter how much you load up the skis with pressure or how soft the skis are the tips still always want to dive lower than the waist of your skis. This causes excessive unweighting or bouncing and leaning back onto your tails. It puts you in an unbalanced position. The point is to get up out of the snow not down in it.

2.“Franz” - Skis will only ever turn by carving. Skis will not in any way be made to slide. Tips and tails during unweighting are always lower than the center of the skis prohibiting any attempt at a slide. Throwing the skis sideways in anyway will end in a caught outside edge followed by a quick whiplash onto your side.


The Spatula’s decamber will prevent most Sunken Plow situations depending on the skiers weight. (The lighter you are the more you will reap the benefits of the decamber.) You will notice that you will not need to lean back on your skis in the powder nearly as much as you would on normal skis. This will allow you to stand upright and attack the mountain much more efficiently.

Having the option to eliminate the Franz carve from your powder skiing will open up a whole new world for you. Try sliding a bit sideways as you finish your turn. Remember to stand on both feet. Try doinga long slide instead of doing a turn at all. Skiers constantly link one turn to the next in powder because in the past we lacked the ability and technology to slide. It also has traditionally been considered proper style to make identical, consecutive linked turns down a powder slope. Now you have the option to carve, slide, crab sideways, hockey stop (If your really good) and basically use the slope in many creative ways instead of such a limited, traditional style.



HOW TO SKI YOUR SPATULAS ON HARD SNOW
These skis are not versatile. I will make no attempts to fool you (as all ski manufacturers typically do) into thinking that you can use these skis in all kinds of snow conditions. They are made specifically for the many types of soft snow. Powder, sun crust, wind affect, deep, shallow, light and heavy. They are not designed to be primarily skied on ice or most types of hard snow. Of course you will frequently find yourself skiing on some sort of hard snow even on a powder day. It may be on the groomer going back to the lift or you may hit a hard patch or a mogul along the way. Not to worry. They can be easily managed in any situation. You just have to know how to do it.

The first question that absolutely everyone always asks me is: “Yea, but how well do they work on the groomer?” The most accurate analogy I have come up with is that they work about as well on the groomer as a pair of GS skis work in the powder. Manageable but not great. However, I am confident that the satisfaction and pleasure which you will receive from the powder intended qualities of these skis will soon make the issue of Spatula performance on hard snow nonexistent. When the situation demands that you ski your Spatulas on the groomer or hard snow it is very important that you remember two things:

1.Stand on both feet.

2.Initiate turns by sliding.

Think of it this way. When initiating a turn using skis with side cut you simply roll the ski on edge and the tip of the ski catches the snow and depending on how much pressure you give it the ski either carves around fast or slowly. No matter what, the ski will turn. This is not so with the Spatula. They have the opposite shape. They were not designed to carve on hard snow. They were designed to slide and carve in soft snow. You will need to train your mind to think slide not carve especially when on the groomer. A ski with reverse side cut if forced to carve on hard snow will perform exactly the opposite task as a ski with side cut. Try it, you’ll see. Start the turn like you normally would. Weight forward shifting to the downhill ski, add pressure to the tip of the downhill ski, follow through with more pressure on the downhill ski through the turn and……..your downhill ski tracks off in the wrong direction and you fall onto your uphill ski! It won’t work! You must initiate your turns on both feet and by sliding them around! After you have begun your turn by sliding you will notice that you can actually finish the turn by carving once you are on your tails if you want. The tails of the Spatulas will catch and you can carve the end of the turn. It all sounds weird I know, but just remember this and try it a couple times on the groomed and you will probably get the hang of it in one run. Remember! You’re a slider now not a carver!


HOW THE SPATULA WAS BORN – A HISTORY
Back in 1996 the ski industry was just beginning to go through two revolutionary discoveries. The invention of “shaped” skis and the popularization of fat skis for soft snow. As we all know now fat skis have totally changed the way we ski powder and shaped skis have totally changed skiing on harder snow. As manufacturers began to experiment with massive side cuts for carving the groomer and the race course it was only natural for people to want to test out these new shaped skis. At the same time skiers were also just beginning to realize the benefits of fat skis in powder. Back then I had also recently made the switch from skiing on traditional skis to the very fat (at the time) Volant Chubb. I was spending my time marveling over the benefits of fat skis in most sow conditions. Then I decided to try out the new shaped skis in the soft snow. Since the qualities of fat skis were so fresh on my mind all the time I was immediately able to recognize how horrible side cut is for soft snow. If I had been skiing on traditional skis all year like most everyone else this revelation may not even have happened.


During the summer of 96 at a bar in Las Lenas Argentina while hanging out with some friends I quickly sketched a picture of some fat skis with reverse side cut onto a beer napkin. We all spoke about it and of course some even laughed at the idea. I took the napkin home and kept it in my “Cool and funny stuff” file in my file cabinet for about 2 years never really expecting that any ski company would bite on the idea. In the mean time as ski companies started making their shaped fat skis with all this side cut I remained skiing on fat skis with minimal side cut trying to milk as much flotation and control as possible from them.


Then in 1998 the Volant design engineers came out to Squaw Valley. The plan was to test out some new shaped fat skis that they wanted to make with a bunch of my friends and knowledgeable skiers. These new skis were basically a Volant Chubb with more side cut. We tested them against many skis including our old, used for a year Chubbs. Yes, they were more versatile and could be used to carve easier turns on the groomed but in the powder they still were more work than skis with minimal side cut. Then Scott Gaffney, who was one of the testers, decided to open his mouth and suggest a concept which is probably the most important yet now seeming so obvious discovery in powder ski technology. He said, “I think my old, dead, decambered Chubbs float much better in the powder than those ones with new ski life or camber.” And then the light bulb flashed on. I dug up my old beer napkin and began pondering the concept. I thought about hard snow and soft snow and began comparing the similarities of powder to water. I realized that the effects of riding on powder snow would be very similar to riding on water. Water skis have reverse side cut. So do surf boards. And they both have decamber or rocker.


Over the course of the next two years I would talk to people about how cool it would be to have skis with decamber and reverse side cut specifically for powder. Almost everyone I mentioned the idea to would either laugh or politely smile. All except for Scott and JT Holmes and a few others.I never really pushed the idea to Volant very hard because I assumed that no one would listen. Nobody buys powder only skis. The industry already lost on that bet. The skis that sell are the all mountain carver that are so versatile right? Right. No one wants to buy more than one pair of skis. So why even attempt to make something that a ski shop can’t even sell? So nothing happened for 2 years. Finally after stewing over it for too long I began talking to the design engineers at Volant about just gong for it and jury rigging a pair or two together in the shop in their spare time. If it wasn’t for the hard work and extra after hours put in by Ryan Carroll and Peter Turner in the Volant factory the first and only four pairs would never have been made in the summer of 2001.


The first prototype arrived at my doorstep in August. Soon afterwards I packed up my beautiful, shimmering, new, steel Spatulas and flew down to New Zealand to work on a film project. As I am a very spoiled professional skier we were heli skiing the whole time and I got to test them out. They immediately blew my mind! Everything was so easy! No more leaning back to prevent tip diving. No more excessive body movements to force the skis around. No more big GS turns or body smears to slow down. No more boot sink.I couldn’t believe it! I ran straight to the phone and called Volant over seas and spewed my guts raving for 45 minutes about how great they are.


Unfortunately when I got home I got the news that Volant was going to be sold to another company and that everyone was getting canned. No one was going to be able to put any time into making more Spatulas. There were four pairs in existence on the planet with no foreseeable solution. I held on to three of them and Ryan Carroll held on to one single ski of the remaining pair. The other single ski went on tour with the new Volant to help promote the Spatula concept if and when we ever got it together enough to start making them again.


Luckily as time would tell Volant got back up on its feet and contracted the Atomic factory in Austria to make all its skis. Perfect! Atomic makes great skis and their standards are nothing short of excellent. They also happen to be the company who first made super fat powder skis back in the 80s. The Atomic Powder Plus or “Fat Boy” is today still considered on of the best powder skis ever made by many western skiers.

Peter Turner and I then pushed for some budget money to be spent on creating around 300 pairs of Spatulas to be made in the Atomic factory.


The powers that be thought it over. Powder specific skis? They won’t sell very fast. If we are lucky we will break even with these skis. But they are revolutionary. They will change the way people think about skiing powder, the most enjoyable type of skiing. They will open up a whole new world for people. It’s a big risk, but what great idea isn’t? Everyone said yes and the project was a go. Now as I sit here and write this its October 2002 and Volant is making the first batch of the greatest powder skis ever. I can’t wait for it to start snowing and for a small part of 300 people’s lives to change! Have fun on your new Spatulas! And remember, if someone makes fun of them, there are no friends on a powder day! You don’t have to wait for their slow ass! Good luck!


Shane McConkey
 

Alexzn

Ski Squaw
Skier
Joined
Nov 13, 2015
Posts
1,956
Location
Bay Area and Truckee
Just to chase the previous post: @Mendieta, here is a quote that relates to your experience in powder, he is talking about skiing normal sidecut skis in powder:

Unstable Hooker: This is when you start a turn and your downhill ski hooks fast and hard up and across your uphill ski. You cross your tips, step on your downhill ski with your uphill and then stuff your face into mountain. Or at high speeds you may have noticed your skis trying to swim around a bit making it hard to control as you try to keep your tips up and out of the snow. The solution to this in the past has always been to maintain a wider stance in powder and to slow it down a bit.

All skis turn by bending or by pivoting. In powder you cannot pivot them, so you have to bend both skis. You do it by by using your weight and speed. This is why you need to have a nearly equal weight distribution and at least SOME speed (the stiffer your skis are, the more speed you need). Also, since you cannot pivot, the turn shape has to be more round by necessity (you can bend a ski in soft powder only so much). The reason why race skis suck on powder is not that they are narrow, but that they are so damn stiff. This is why I cringe when people talk about how great their Bonafides and Enforcers are in powder. They are not, at least not compared to a true powder ski that is softer and has an even flex.

The stance is not that important, however, if you have a narrower stance in powder it is easier to keep both of your skis doing the same thing. The best powder skiers I have seen don't drive their skis too narrowly when they are making turns, that allows them to maintain good angulation.
 

karlo

Out on the slopes
Inactive
Joined
May 11, 2017
Posts
2,708
Location
NJ
a narrower stance in powder it is easier to keep both of your skis doing the same thing. The best powder skiers I have seen don't drive their skis too narrowly when they are making turns, that allows them to maintain good angulation.

Meaning a wider stance is less forgiving to keep both skis doing the same thing, right? If so, what abilities does one need to get the skis working in tandem?
 

oldschoolskier

Making fresh tracks
Skier
Joined
Dec 6, 2015
Posts
4,225
Location
Ontario Canada
One of the things that muddles this whole thread is the term wide stance as it varies greatly from skier to skier when no reference is given.

So what I define in my mind as wide is different from what you define as wide in your minds eye. So that we are all speaking the same language (and by no means is this meant to be best one it is just a reference that I always have used):

Narrow: Boot to Boot (varies a little depending on body shape).

Wide: Anything greater than just under shoulder width (varies a little depending on body shape).

Normal: Anything in between as it depends on application and body shape.

So made the question and answer deal with:

You should widen/narrow your stance a little/lot to help with the following.......problem, as it will help in this manner.........


The good instructors and coaches are doing this (some of which have posted herein).
 

LiquidFeet

instructor
Instructor
Joined
Nov 12, 2015
Posts
6,697
Location
New England
Here's a wide parallel stance.
This skier could benefit from skiing narrower.
Feet are currently farther apart than either shoulders or hips.
This skier would not choose to walk this way; it's awkward.
Being able to ski with feet walking-width apart would allow
this skier to move weight from outside ski to outside ski
at slow speeds on moderate slopes.
Not saying that closer is always best, but this skier will advance
once she can alter stance width at will.
beginning-skier.jpg

image from this website: https://www.angelfireresort.com/act...g-and-snowboarding/ski-and-snowboard-lessons/
 
Last edited:

green26

Putting on skis
Skier
Joined
May 7, 2016
Posts
96
Location
Santa Barbara CA
My apologies if this has already been mentioned - I’ve been thinking about this thread since it began, and my question is always Why Narrower? My focus has always been on making a wider stance. Then I had an excellent ski week at Taos this year that confirmed this for me in practice. Our instructor, Doug, comically but firmly emphasized a wide stance. This was pretty cool, although usually his specific instruction about this was delivered in a very good fake German accent. He pointed out that with a wide stance you powerfully engage the muscles on the inside and outside of your thighs (whatever the hell they are called), but with a narrow stance these are disengaged, so you lose that whole source of energy and functionality. We mainly skied Taos bumps fast (they are different than anywhere else I’ve been - :) So - to make a long story short, the point was to feel the burn on the inside / outside of my thighs to know that I was engaging those muscle groups.

Also, last year I was pissed off because my new expensive Patagonia pants scuff guards were destroyed (Patagonia repaired them for FREE). Some of the feedback I got from the old forum was “then keep your damn feet farther apart!”. This set off a lightbulb over my head. So it dawned on me that perhaps you keep your legs far apart to protect the scuff guards. ;-)
 

Magi

Instructor
Instructor
Joined
Apr 8, 2017
Posts
404
Location
Winter Park, Colorado
My apologies if this has already been mentioned - I’ve been thinking about this thread since it began, and my question is always Why Narrower?


My understanding is as follows:

The wider your stance, the wider your base of support.

The wider your base of support, the more you can be wrong with lateral balance and not fall over. (Put your feet outside of hip width and try to fall sideways without violent effort)

The downside of widening is that your skis will eventually be on opposed edges (both on the inside), and unable to rotate your skis on the snow (because the edges are engaged). Think of doing the splits, as an extreme example.

We fix this for beginners by rotating their feet into a wedge. Boom! Flat ski, instant "impossible" to fall balance, and rotation of the ski under the foot is possible.

As skiers develop lateral balance, they can trade off stability for performance - by moving to corresponding edges rotated under the hip sockets.

So then the question becomes: "Why would I want to ski narrower than hip width?" and the short version of the answer is "because, in that situation, it helps me balance better." The cost is that you generally have less strength and flexibility in that position (There's a reason powerlifters squat with their feet where they do, eh?).



Fun thought - the inner edges of my feet are separated by about 6 - 8 inches when I'm standing with my feet under my hips. I figure with ski boots on that leaves me about 2-4 inches of "move in" (per foot) that I can do in ski boots. I can move my feet about ten times that away from the center of my body without risking groin injury..
 

dj61

Getting on the lift
Skier
Joined
Feb 25, 2017
Posts
222
The wider your base of support, the more you can be wrong with lateral balance and not fall over. (Put your feet outside of hip width and try to fall sideways without violent effort)
Yes, if you are on a flat surface or go straight downhill a wider stance gives stability. Downhillers have a relatively wide stance. Both conditions are seldom satisfied when you are skiing like most mortals do. A wide stance hinders you in any other circumstance on the slopes. Furthermore, you are right that a wide stance seems to give stability but only in a static situation. Ski instructors use this trick to convince their students of the pro's of a wide stance. They put you on a slope in narrow stance and push you over. Then they tell you to spread your legs. Much harder to push you over. Convincing, right? No a complete fallacy, because you are not moving. In turns you are dynamic and speed and gravity and centrifugal forces are your friends and you can balance perfectly on one leg.
Try this instead: move you balance from one leg to another in a narrow stance. Easy. Now try the same when you are in a very wide stance. Very hard. What do you need to do when skiing? Right.
 

Tricia

The Velvet Hammer
Admin
SkiTalk Tester
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Posts
27,297
Location
Reno
My apologies if this has already been mentioned - I’ve been thinking about this thread since it began, and my question is always Why Narrower? My focus has always been on making a wider stance. Then I had an excellent ski week at Taos this year that confirmed this for me in practice. Our instructor, Doug, comically but firmly emphasized a wide stance. This was pretty cool, although usually his specific instruction about this was delivered in a very good fake German accent. He pointed out that with a wide stance you powerfully engage the muscles on the inside and outside of your thighs (whatever the hell they are called), but with a narrow stance these are disengaged, so you lose that whole source of energy and functionality. We mainly skied Taos bumps fast (they are different than anywhere else I’ve been - :) So - to make a long story short, the point was to feel the burn on the inside / outside of my thighs to know that I was engaging those muscle groups.

Also, last year I was pissed off because my new expensive Patagonia pants scuff guards were destroyed (Patagonia repaired them for FREE). Some of the feedback I got from the old forum was “then keep your damn feet farther apart!”. This set off a lightbulb over my head. So it dawned on me that perhaps you keep your legs far apart to protect the scuff guards. ;-)
I think there is a balance.
Instruction to me has generally been Hip Width.
If your stance is too closed, you can't get on edge because your skis are locked together. If your stance is too wide(more than hip width, you can't move your femurs
 

Zentune

Getting on the lift
Instructor
Joined
Nov 21, 2015
Posts
143
Location
MT/ID
I think it's important to consider what we mean by "hip-width" as well. To some it may mean the overall width of the pelvis, to others and myself it may mean acetabulum to acetabulum, which would be the "normal" width that we use during everyday gait cycles (running or walking).

There are quite a few overall differences, in inches) between these two....if you look at my avatar, I'm about femur head to femur head apart, horizontally with my feet whereas the gentleman behind me is more around the pelvic-width zone...

zenny
 
Last edited:

Tricia

The Velvet Hammer
Admin
SkiTalk Tester
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Posts
27,297
Location
Reno
I think it's important to consider what we mean by "hip-width" as well. To some it may mean the overall width of the pelvis, to others and myself it may mean acetabulum to acetabulum, which would be the "normal" width that we use during everyday gait cycles (running or walking).

There are quite a few overall differences, in inches) between these two....

zenny
:thumb:
For me - Hip Width = where my legs/feet would hang naturally if I were dangling on a pull up bar.
 
Thread Starter
TS
Cheizz

Cheizz

AKA Gigiski
Skier
Joined
Aug 15, 2016
Posts
1,958
Location
The Netherlands
I have no recent footage of myself skiing, but here's a guy that skis with the same stance I do. Just to give you an idea...

0:24 - 0:36 is what my stance looks like at the moment...

 

LiquidFeet

instructor
Instructor
Joined
Nov 12, 2015
Posts
6,697
Location
New England
I just watched the video.

There are seven people named at the end, so I'm guessing there are seven people skiing.
There are slight differences in stance width. Some appear to ski with feet walking distance apart.
The rest have them a wee bit wider.
But none of them have the overly wide stance people sometimes embed as a habit after learning to ski in a wedge.

If cosmetics were the issue, I'd prefer walking distance apart.

But cosmetics isn't the issue, it's the ability to handle all terrain and all conditions.
These seven instructors all handle that initial run pretty much identically, and the ones in deeper snow do just fine.
The small difference in stance width doesn't affect their ability to ski these runs.

Do people make too much over the small difference in stance width exhibited in this video?
 
Last edited:

john petersen

working through minutia to find the big picture!
Instructor
Joined
May 8, 2017
Posts
327
Location
Eastern
I think it's important to consider what we mean by "hip-width" as well. To some it may mean the overall width of the pelvis, to others and myself it may mean acetabulum to acetabulum, which would be the "normal" width that we use during everyday gait cycles (running or walking).

There are quite a few overall differences, in inches) between these two....if you look at my avatar, I'm about femur head to femur head apart, horizontally with my feet whereas the gentleman behind me is more around the pelvic-width zone...

zenny


I just want to clarify what the acetabulum is.....

noun
Anatomy
noun: acetabulum; plural noun: acetabula
  1. the socket of the hipbone, into which the head of the femur fits.
    • Zoology
      any cup-shaped structure, especially a sucker.
Then, I realized, I fit into the second category at times..... ;)


For me the bottom line is that there are functional widths for different terrain and conditions based on a functional width for each person, if that makes any sense. Different conditions require us to be flexible in all areas and that means in our minds too....More and more I am fighting the tendency to catalog concepts (in my noggin) using absolutes. for example, "you want a wide stance", "ski with counter", "plant your pole", "carve", "flat ski", "ski on your outside ski to outside ski"......ect......

dont get me wrong, we NEED to catalog these concepts. In the file cabinet in my brain I want each folder to contain more than one image, concept or memory....I want to be flexible. Skill blend. concept blend. expansion.

too much coffee this morning, apologies!

JP
 

Sponsor

Staff online

Top