IMHO...
The learning style debate, arguably, has merit on both sides.....but, I think this may be one of those theories that gives educators better perspective and more depth of knowledge on the possibilities of how people learn. Its a beneficial theory for an educator to have knowledge on. It allows them to be more versatile in their approach to any given teaching segment. I am of the belief that we all use many different learning styles at any given time and may indeed need to experience more that a set few when being taught.
For skiing, I try to say it, draw it, show it, then ask for participation. This covers a few bases in a simple and quick way. If there are questions, I know that person needs to hear more, or see a different diagram (drawn in the snow) or see another demonstration......If there are not questions, then folks are generally thinking about the topic and internalizing (or tuning me out!). when I hear, "Im ready to try that!".....I know something clicked!
skills are acquired through repetition, practice, failure, success, ect....
getting back to analogies, The familiarity analogies induce for me, anyway, helps my confidence.....If I can do the analogous thing, then it seems I can do this new thing and am more willing to try it out.....
Feedback can be analogous too..... Good work there on those left turns, smooth as silk.....good use of short snaky turns to navigate a crowded slope, I can really see your upper and lower body actually separating!......
JP
