You think punters who don't relish the prospect of doing wedge turns for hours until they are absolutely perfect are an exception?
Or maybe you mean instructors who relish doing drills ad infititum are the exception? The latter I can belive but among my friends who have gone down the route it does seem to become a bit of a (necessary) obsession for higher grade exams.
FWIW I agree on the base mileage point, I have a fundamental disagreement that the only way to get that mileage is with a trained expert, but it isn't a bad starting point for an unknown skier with perhaps dubious quality ski companions.
I absolutely agree on the FUN part - sliding down mountains is fundamentally about fun and it is a small proportion of the student population who will automatically go for the "I really want todo this properly and don't mind if that means deferring my pleasure".
Point by point, I think very very few people relish the prospect of doing wedge turns for hours. That's why they're not taught for hours and hours. With good instruction on the right terrain, most learners will begin to match into parallel between turns pretty quickly. With the right terrain, direct to parallel is possible. Concerning the 'why' of having wedge turns as an exam task, it shows a particular blend of timing and skills that indicates (relative) mastery of certain movement patterns and application of D.I.R.T. I can do some mean ones, but certainly didn't spend hours and hours doing them.
Instructors doing drills ad infinium is also not particularly useful beyond a certain point. Many aspiring L2 skiers (L3 as well) indeed tend to lose the forest fore the trees by making mastery of the drill the goal. Sometimes there's little a trainer can do to prevent this other than to harp on the notion that examiners aren't looking for mastery of a drill, they're looking for good skiing. Good is measurable and starts with looking at snow/ski interaction. I'm sorry your friends are out in the 'if I do this, I'll pass the exam' weeds. This isn't 'PSIA-learned', it's just overthinking and obsessing. In my own experience, most of the instructors I know and work with love to free ski, and ski the entire mountain. Some ski it better than others, but all are fun to ski with.
Mileage with strong skiers is great. When one of those strong skiers can actually provide a good (and wanted) MA and ideas for helping with (wanted) change, it's even better. If a skier is happy with their skiing, I'm happy too. Doesn't bother me a bit how others ski unless they're paying me to make changes and their current skill sets aren't endangering other people on the hill.
Good coaching/instruction/clinics are fun. So is free skiing. Nothing in skiing is mutually exclusive.
Hope that helps explain my thoughts better.
Last edited: