Yes, we've found that we've needed to change some of our bookmarks.
Sorry for the inconvenience, but...
It's not a big deal - just wanted to save everyone else a minute or two of finding URLs and comparing them.
Yes, we've found that we've needed to change some of our bookmarks.
Sorry for the inconvenience, but...
Don't be too quick, they may make back to original in a day or two.Yes, we've found that we've needed to change some of our bookmarks.
Sorry for the inconvenience, but...
Yes, we've found that we've needed to change some of our bookmarks.
Sorry for the inconvenience, but...
Mine did not change, and have been available.Don't be too quick, they may make back to original in a day or two.
Believe it or not, its on our "to do list"I see the New Posts side bar is back on the home page and New Profile Posts back on the main forum page. Personally, I'd switch those but I'm glad the New Posts is back somewhere. Thanks!
View attachment 29818
View attachment 29819
Don't be too quick, they may make back to original in a day or two.
From your fingers to the industry's eyes. Thank you very much for the glimpse into the future.Another well thought out and innovative move forward toward Pugski's eventual total global dominance of the ski industry.
I can see it now:
Phil and Tricia enter the SIA Main Floor. There is a hush among the crowd. Vendors are quickly whispering to each other as they plan their strategy when they are graced by the entrance of the Pugski entourage into their booth. The uninitiated will whisper "who are they?" Even those who had previously enjoyed great status in the industry will follow like sheep in hopes of picking up on just a single word.
It is a glorious future.
From your fingers to the industry's eyes. Thank you very much for the glimpse into the future.
Mine says Pugski. Anyone else?Hmmm, I hadn't noticed that but now that you mention it.
View attachment 29874
We'll look into that.Is the any chance at all to make the thread names darker? Or bold? Or something (not red!) that makes them stand out more than the names of the threadstarter, below? I find my eye drawn to the person's name more than the thread . . .