^ @Monique, that is good news
One of these days I'm going to have to try hot yoga, been hearing nothing but good things about it.
My ACL surgery recovery (one and a half weeks out) is going well. Had my first PT visit today. The therapist says skiing by next years Gathering is a realistic goal.
I face planted in some powder at Sugarbush this past april and neither binding released and I tweaked my right knee a bit. It hurt a little to walk and it was swollen. I iced the hell out of it and it felt 100% within a week. That freaked me out a little bit. Need to check my DIN as I felt at least one ski should have popped off.
No time like the present!
Word of caution on skiing a lower DIN - Prerelease can be much more dangerous than no release.Righto. My Kenjas are the ones with the Marker Griffons on them so since I'm swapping out bindings anyway I wasn't worried about it. When we went to Banff and they told me what my recommended DIN I thought it was too high but didn't say anything. Then after I wiped in Sugarbush and my bindings didn't release and should have that got me thinking my DIN was probably too high. I now question all my DIN settings so one by one I"m getting them checked. I like a lower DIN than my Skier Type II and weigh dictate so I've realized I need to start telling them what I would like my DIN to be. I don't even want to be in a situation again where I wipe and my skis should release and don't because that's a surefire way to hurt something. I got lucky with my fall but I don't want to bank on getting lucky again.
I like a lower DIN than my Skier Type II and weigh dictate so I've realized I need to start telling them what I would like my DIN to be. I don't even want to be in a situation again where I wipe and my skis should release and don't because that's a surefire way to hurt something.
By definition, this means you are skier type 1 - you want a release sooner than the DIN of a skier type 2.
Word of caution on skiing a lower DIN - Prerelease can be much more dangerous than no release.
I'm not a ski tech expert but I've read Look Pivot's are safe when used at a lower DIN setting. However, Pivot's may be terrible WRT phantom fall ACL concerns regardless of DIN setting, another can of worms which hopefully will be addressed with a successful outcome in 2018 - https://howell-ski-bindings.myshopify.com/
I agree too low is bad. I've been going for a DIN of 5.5 rather than the recommended 7 so i don't think 5.5 is too low. 7 just seems too high given I'm not aggressive. I know too low can be dangerous so 5.5 seems like a compromise. Probably more like that DIN for a type 1 skier even though I'm a type 2.
What ... um, what numerical basis do you have for the estimation of what seems high or low?
If i'm missing something please tell me.
I ski Look Pivot 14s at 5.5 and have for years. I've never had a release that was inappropriate.
Me too, but that is also exactly where DIN calculator puts me as an advanced skier, would be 4.5 if I dial that down to intermediate skier. My Pivot 14 won't go that low, my Pivot 12 will and I would not feel any less confident with that particular binding set at 4.5 DIN. Marker on the other hand, well let's just say I'd never buy a Marker and leave it at that.I ski Look Pivot 14s at 5.5 and have for years. I've never had a release that was inappropriate.
Me too, but that is also exactly where DIN calculator puts me as an advanced skier, would be 4.5 if I dial that down to intermediate skier. My Pivot 14 won't go that low, my Pivot 12 will and I would not feel any less confident with that particular binding set at 4.5 DIN. Marker on the other hand, well let's just say I'd never buy a Marker and leave it at that.
http://www.dincalculator.com/#/