w/stainless steel cup for the pole tip! (across the Pivot line)
THAT's what I want!
All in favor, please respond
THAT's what I want!
All in favor, please respond
And they can bring back the 2-6 and 3-9 while they are at it, 6-9-12-15-18. I'd be happy with a 80-85mm brake option. I Don't think they need to drop the 14 but just make that the Dual (WTR) compatible model.Yes please. Just put a softer spring in the P18 and charge us $50 less for it. (The inverse of what you do for the P12/P14). Oh, and drop the 14 while you're at it. P12, P15, P18 -- nice even gaps.
How 'bout we spice up this thread with PIX of your PIVOT's on snow?
Don't have to be 15's... just PIVOT love in general.
As to the 'don't have any', that's why we need to bring them back!!!
How 'bout we spice up this thread with PIX of your PIVOT's on snow?
Yes, it is a (Nordica) Steadfast rule.Isn't getting married and skiing on a powder day good for at least 50 years of unimaginable happiness?
I'm pretty sure that's the rule...
I have some blue Pivot 15's that would look very good on the Enforcers.
I know it was a pivotal experience for me.Isn't getting married and skiing on a powder day good for at least 50 years of unimaginable happiness?
I'm pretty sure that's the rule...
Bindings are all about confidence. I skied S727's then got on a pair of 747's and had a nasty pre release on Conclusion at Kton, I didn't ski Salomons again until the 977 came out. I walked out of some Marker M51's in a bad situation and still haven't fully committed back to them.Hmm, I guess I am in a minority of 1 here but I have no love at all for the Pivot family. Still too many bad memories from the old 77/99 (iirc) not latching in properly with the inevitable results. Never quite trust them iim afraid. Although I do have one set of FKS 18 in the quiver on an older Rossi DH. however based on a lot more experience with the PX?MX series the 15/18 toe is a whole lot better.
The demand for a Pivot 15 is intriguing to me. Why not just ski the 18? I kind of like the way they have the binding line set up right now. The Pivot 14 is a great binding for most skiers, and if you want the full metal toe piece jump up to the 18.
Is it a DIN range issue or spring weight?
It's the non useful DIN range of the 18 and I want the one piece full metal toe.
I usually ski mine @ 7 or a bit less (yes, big feet)
And anyone who CAN'T stay in a Pivot @ 15 DIN is doing something wrong!
The 12 and 14 are the same binding, and unless someone is skiing over a 10DIN, the 12 is just fine, that brings us to the 15 verses 18. The 15 has a 6-15 range which is more than fine for more than 95% of the skiers out there that ski a higher DIN binding, the other less than 5% probably have never bought a piece of gear in their life. Look offers the 1018 for the race skis so that range isn't needed. I think Salomon did a good job making the 16DIN a 7-16 verses the old one being 9-16.The demand for a Pivot 15 is intriguing to me. Why not just ski the 18? I kind of like the way they have the binding line set up right now. The Pivot 14 is a great binding for most skiers, and if you want the full metal toe piece jump up to the 18.
Is it a DIN range issue or spring weight?