• For more information on how to avoid pop-up ads and still support SkiTalk click HERE.

Worst Skis Ever?

Carl

On the north side of the mountain
Skier
Joined
Nov 18, 2015
Posts
219
Location
New England
Realskiers has an interesting article on their take of the 10 worst skis ever made. Number 4 on the list were Graves. I had a pair given to me in 1979 by a marketing guy at the company. They were manufactured in New Hampshire and I remember visiting the company on the way back to Boston from a ski trip. I can attest that they were the most unpleasant boards I've ever strapped onto my feet. Built like a tank and skied like one as well.

Did anyone have the chance to ski any of these on the list?...

http://www.realskiers.com/NEWSLETTERS/worst-skis.html
 

Philpug

Notorious P.U.G.
Admin
SkiTalk Tester
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Posts
42,915
Location
Reno, eNVy
I just saw Jackson the other day and we talked about this and compared notes. The one that was missing from the list was the Fritzmeier Duo's, the 170cm ski that added weights to make it feel longer. @Andy Mink found me a pair and I have them in the collection.
 

cantunamunch

Meh
Skier
Joined
Nov 17, 2015
Posts
22,182
Location
Lukey's boat
I had the Hexcel Blue Ices - and I could never get the upper set of edges to engage without levering the bottom set out of the groove. Sharpening them was relatively easy with one of those compact file tools. I finally wound up taking them off a jump - and squishing the binding down into the ski.

I still have a set of Elan Predators - which are like Stilletos only name-engineered - and I really like them a lot. The only problem with them is that the binding lifters are so small that they can only be drilled once, so changing binding position, or bindings, is not a low-stress option.

45mm waists are very skiable - I've long felt that the 60mm+ people seem to regard as the lower limit for carvers is completely and totally arbitrary.
 

Dadskier

Getting off the lift
Skier
Joined
Nov 10, 2015
Posts
533
Location
Massachusetts
I just saw Jackson the other day and we talked about this and compared notes. The one that was missing from the list was the Fritzmeier Duo's, the 170cm ski that added weights to make it feel longer. @Andy Mink found me a pair and I have them in the collection.

I still remember when you had that demo pair of Solomon BBR's when we came out to Tahoe.
 

crgildart

Gravity Slave
Skier
Joined
Nov 12, 2015
Posts
16,490
Location
The Bull City
I saw a LOT of Rossi FMs exlode. I had a pair of 175 cm that held up fine but I only weighed about 95 pounds when I was skiing them.
 

fatbob

Not responding
Skier
Joined
Nov 12, 2015
Posts
6,332
Is the BBR really that terrible? I never got to try them but my perception is that they just overdid the marketing be by making them out to be the best thing since sliced bread. Reality seems to be that people who like them really like them, just those people aren't the technical/aggressive "serious" skiers.


And just because it makes me giggle as an example of corporate shilling gone mad here's the otherwise highly regarded Emma + Phil at Snoworks doing their best "it makes your toast and gets the kids ready for school" advertorial.
 
Last edited:

Philpug

Notorious P.U.G.
Admin
SkiTalk Tester
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Posts
42,915
Location
Reno, eNVy
There were a lot of first generation shape skis that were really bad. Manufacturers were rushing to get product to market and they were just showing designs against the wall to see what stuck. A few that come to mind...

Fischer Revolution Ice, a shape that actually had the tail wider than the tip
Salomon Axendo, just flexing them broke the tails.

We saw a similar situate with manufacturers trying to figure what early rise was all about..

Fischer (again) with the Rocker on demand, a switch to add or remove rocker, it added nothing but weight
Head with the first Peak skis, they cut a channel just past the contact point of the tip which was designed to let the ski flex easier there but it just created a hinge point and the tip just folded over when pressured through the turn.

More Runner Ups:
Rossignol Multix with the bag of arms that you could control the flex of the skis
Dynastar with the Fusion and ID skis, asymmetrical sidewalls and sidecuts.
Salomon Pilots wth arguably the worst integrated binding design
Volant TSBD (Tight Spots Big Drops), Volant had many innovated skis, this was not one of them.
Elan SCX RP 193, the first ski made for an NFL linebacker, a PRO Bowl linebacker at that.
 

Uncle-A

In the words of Paul Simon "You can call me Al"
Skier
Joined
Dec 22, 2015
Posts
10,975
Location
NJ
The list names the Kastle B52 as the worst ski but how many different B52's are there? Just like how many K2 AMP,s are there?
 

Dave Petersen

Graphic Designer/Social Media Manager
Admin
SkiTalk Supporter
Joined
Nov 16, 2015
Posts
9,894
I just saw Jackson the other day and we talked about this and compared notes. The one that was missing from the list was the Fritzmeier Duo's, the 170cm ski that added weights to make it feel longer. @Andy Mink found me a pair and I have them in the collection.

Fritzmeier.jpg
 

Eleeski

Making fresh tracks
Skier
Joined
Nov 13, 2015
Posts
2,299
Location
San Diego / skis at Squaw Valley
I've always claimed that if weight was a beneficial characteristic then skis would be better with added weight. To hear knowledgeable Phil and the authors put the Fritzmeier with its added weights in the worst ski category gives some support to my position.

However, I kind of liked the BBRs (maybe a little less when I found out they weren't named PBRs) and really wanted Durafiber skis so maybe the judgment is suspect.

Eric
 

James

Out There
Instructor
Joined
Dec 2, 2015
Posts
24,953
I've always claimed that if weight was a beneficial characteristic then skis would be better with added weight. To hear knowledgeable Phil and the authors put the Fritzmeier with its added weights in the worst ski category gives some support to my position.

However, I kind of liked the BBRs (maybe a little less when I found out they weren't named PBRs) and really wanted Durafiber skis so maybe the judgment is suspect.
Eric

Adding weights is one thing, heavy is another. The older Stockli VXL was heavy. Couple it with a Vist plate and it was really heavy. Awesome ski. Everything isn't black and white.
 

Dave Petersen

Graphic Designer/Social Media Manager
Admin
SkiTalk Supporter
Joined
Nov 16, 2015
Posts
9,894
We needs pics of all the skis on the list.
 

Philpug

Notorious P.U.G.
Admin
SkiTalk Tester
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Posts
42,915
Location
Reno, eNVy
Here are pic of the Fritzmeier Duo's:
IMG_0428.JPG
IMG_0429.JPG
IMG_0430.JPG
IMG_0431.JPG
IMG_0432.JPG

Unfortunately, I don't have the weights and also the covers that would cover the weights are seized on.
 

Eleeski

Making fresh tracks
Skier
Joined
Nov 13, 2015
Posts
2,299
Location
San Diego / skis at Squaw Valley
My favorite ice ski was the Bode Miller Head SL race ski. Absolutely fantastic - and extremely heavy. But I didn't buy it. "I hate ice" and really didn't like getting my knees pulled out of their sockets on the chairlift ride up. Weight is certainly not everything but too much is a disqualifier. But too heavy does not necessarily put the ski on the worst list.

Waiting for the review on the ball bearings in oil. Maybe I'll actually see it someday.

Still loving my ultralight Goodes. Darn heavy bindings and boots take away some of the advantage.

Eric
 

Sponsor

Top