Stenmark suffered a bad DH crash in the summer in the late 70's. He was "spooked", and I am pretty sure that he raced in just one WC DH as part of a combined, and he was 10+ seconds out. Not his thing. And he was unapologetic.
SG was introduced near the end of his career. He raced a few. Things were very different then in terms of SG course sets and speeds. A WC GS of today reminds me a lot of the initial SG's. As I recall, Stenmark did not do that well, though nobody doubted that he could have been great. The guy had the best touch of anybody.
A lot of people initially thought SG was some BS hybrid. Just some ploy to favor the speed fans. Some sissyfied version of DH. That is until it was raced a fair amount. It's a GREAT event. Inspect and one run. No training days. Hard to imagine things today with no SG.
It was explained to me that as a young ski racer, Stenmark simply had a different upbringing than say an Austrian. He developed his perfect technical skills, at home. Back in those days, "National Development" teams and projects were rarely flying kids to places to develop speed skills.
Stenmark was just amazing. The rate at which he won, and his margins were incredible. He owned the SL and GS disciplines. The math worked such that he was able to win his globes with no DH. If you look back in history, you will notice a big number of combineds added to the schedules after he became dominant, and won the overall. Then of course the SG's were added.
I have had some old, sage gentlemen involved with FIS, and the WC, tell me that in particular the Austrians and the Swiss, but really all of the European Federations, joined by the USA, felt strongly that it was just "wrong" that Stenmark could win the overall without being an "all rounder". They all placed their DH heroes on pedestals. Those guys were the alpinists! How could some Swede refuse to ski speed and be the best? Funny, if some guy won in just DH and GS, there may have been no uprising. But there was no such guy!
OK, so change the rules. I know that one year that Phil Mahre won, he won something like 3-4 races. That was it. He killed the combined races in particular. Won four or five globes. He was on a lot of SL podiums, and crashed in a lot! Phil winning pissed off a ton of Euro's, so the rules then changed again. Fewer combineds. More SG's.
I have never had a great handle on Phil Mahre. Or Steve. I have met both as younger guys. Both were real introverts. I guess you could perhaps attribute it to being competitive. They sure as heck did not try to make friends. The twins had each other. Pretty much their own program. I think they "softened" as they got older...some cynics saying that they realized they needed to be nice to the customers. I think we all change, and the last time I had a chat with Phil he could not have been nicer. This is when he was making his race comeback, hoping to qualify for Nationals at 50.
In following years, I recall reading comments from both Mahres about how much they respected Stenmark. They stopped short of saying that he was by FAR a much better skier....all of the DH and gamesmanship aside.
I can't recall any suggestion that he was anything but a great competitor.
Watch some video of that era, SL and GS. I think it shocks most people. Stenmark's quiet upper body, incredible balance and touch, along with great tactics led him to those 87 wins. I think Phil won about 15 SL and GS WC races. Zero DH. A TON of combineds.
Phil was no doubt an incredible athlete and competitor. No Stenmark.
Stenmark won 8 SL globes and 8 GS globes. That is just amazing. Still blows me away.
Very different era. Always hard to compare the guys from other eras. Safe to say he was amazing. I also think that the fact that LV will hopefully challenge his win mark is equally amazing.